ABSTRACT
Objective To summarize the imaging features of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (ISFT).Methods Ten patients with ISFT proven histopathologically were collected.Four cases had CT data and all cases had MR data.The imaging features and pathological results were retrospectively analyzed.Results All cases were misdiagnosed as meningioma at pre-operation.All lesions arose from intracranial meninges including 5 lesions above the tentorium,4 lesions beneath the tentorium and 1lesion growing around the tentorium.The margins of all the masses were well defined,and 8 lesions presented multilobular shape.CT demonstrated hyerattenuated masses in all 4 lesions,smooth erosion of the basicranial skull in 1lesion,and punctiform calcification of the capsule in 1lesion.T1WI showed most lesions with isointense or slight hyperintense signals including homogeneous in 4 lesions and heterogeneous in 6 lesions.T2WI demonstrated isointense or slight hyperintense in 2 lesions,mixed hypointense and hyperintense signals in 4,cystic portion in 2,and two distinct portion of hyperintense and hypointense signal,so called “yin-yang”pattern,in 2.Strong enhanced was found in all lesions,especially in 8 lesion with heterogeneous with the low T2 signal.“Dural tail” was found in 4 lesions.Conclusions ISFI has some specific CT and MR features including heterogeneous signal intensity on T2WI,strong enhancement of areas with low T2 signal intensity,slight or no “dural tail”,without skull thickening,and the typical “yin-yang” pattern.
ABSTRACT
[Objective]To compare the reliability and value of clinical signs,MRI imaging and arthroscopy in management of meniscal tears in order to increase the diagnostic rate.[Method]A retrospective study was done on 176 cases undergoing MRI examination and arthroscopic treatment,and being diagnosed as meniscal injuries in knee joint by any one of the three clinical,MRI or arthroscopic examinations.Using arthroscopic diagnosis as the standard,the sensitivity,specificity.and overall accuracy of clinical diagnosis and MRI were then calculated respectively.Significant differences between arthroscopic diagnosis and clinical diagnosis or MRI diagnosis were analyzed using statistical method of Chi-square test.[Result]The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of clinical diagnosis were 79.3%,26.3% and 73.8% respectively.There was statistically significant difference between arthroscopic diagnosis and clinical diagnosis.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MRI diagnosis were 94.1%,92.9% and 93.4% respectively.The difference between arthroscopic diagnosis and MRI diagnosis had no statistically significance and can be used as an important examination before knee arthroscopy.[Conclusion]MRI is a reliable,noninvasive diagnostic tool for meniscal tears and can be used as an important examination before knee arthros copy with MRI examination combining with the clinical signs,diagnotic rate of meniscal tears can be increased.Unnecessary arthroscopic therapy could be avoided.